Egalitarian Machine Learning

Prediction-based decisions, which are often made by utilizing the tools of machine learning, influence nearly all facets of modern life.

Ethical concerns about this widespread practice have given rise to the young field of fair machine learning and a number of fairness measures--mathematically precise definitions of fairness that purport to determine whether a given prediction-based decision system is fair. Following Reuben Binns, I take “fairness” in this context to be a placeholder for a variety of normative egalitarian considerations. I explore a few fairness measures to suss out their egalitarian roots and evaluate them, both as formalizations of egalitarian ideas and as assertions of what fairness demands of predictive systems. I pay special attention to a recent and promising fairness measure, counterfactual fairness, which holds that a prediction about an individual is fair if it is the same in the actual world and any counterfactual world where the individual belongs to a different demographic group.

Author: Clinton Castro